Demo instance: a JournTech demo prepared by HB Tech for Hacettepe University, not an official university site. Records are samples from public sources; submissions and reviews are fictional.

This record comes from the journal's DergiPark archive; original page: DergiPark

Abstract

The impact of education and expertise in art on the process of examining a work of art has been studied in the present study via eye tracking method. The main purpose of the study was to compare a group of experts and non-experts in art with regard to eye tracking measurements, artwork analyses and recall performance. In this research, expert and non-expert groups were compared in terms of eye tracking measurements, heat maps, artwork analysis and the recall performances. Heat maps were demonstrated that experts viewed Early Renaissance and Fauvism movements, artworks more while non-experts viewed Fauvist artworks more in comparison with AOIs. However, it was indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the expert and non-expert groups for each artwork about eye metrics and recall performance during art-work analysis. On the other hand, artwork analysis grades of the experts were deter-mined to be higher at a statistically significant level in comparison with the non-experts.

Abstract (Turkish, translation)

Sanat Eğitimi ve Uzmanlık: Bir Göz İzleme Çalışması

Bu araştırmada sanat eğitimi ve sanatta uzmanlaşmanın sanat eseri inceleme süreci üzerindeki rolü göz izleme tekniği kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın temel amacı, sanat eseri inceleme esnasında sanatta uzman grup ile uzman olmayan grubu göz izleme ölçümleri, eser inceleme ve hatırlama performansı açısından karşılaştırmaktır. Araştırmada profesyonel resim sanatçılarından oluşan uzman grup ile sanat eğitimi almamış iki grup, üç farklı sanat dönemini (Erken Rönesans, Modern, Çağdaş) yansıtan resimleri incelerken göz izleme ölçümleri; ısı haritaları, jüri tarafından belirlenen eser inceleme puanları ve hatırladıkları detay miktarı açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Isı haritaları, Erken Rönesans ve çağdaş döneme ait eserlerde uzmanların, modern döneme ait eserde ise uzman olmayanların AOI’lere daha fazla baktığını göstermiştir. Buna karşın, her üç eser için de uzman olan ve olmayan grup arasında resim inceleme esnasındaki göz izleme metrikleri ve hatırlama performansı açısından anlamlı fark olmadığını gösterilmiştir. Öte yandan, uzman grubun eser inceleme puanları uzman olmayanlardan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Files

Only the metadata of this record is published.

References

  1. Arnheim, R. (2007). Visual thinking. (2nd ed). 35th Anniversary Printing: University of California Press.
  2. Brinkmann, H., Commare, L., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Abstract art as a universal language?. Leonardo, 47(3), 256-257. doi: 10.1162/LEON_a_00767
  3. Birch, J. & McKeever, L. M. (1991). Survey of the accuracay of new pseudoisochromatic plates. Ophtalmic and Physiological Optics, 13, 35-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00423.x
  4. Borji, A., & Itti, L. (2014). Defending Yarbus: Eye movements reveal observers' task. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 29-29. doi: 10.1167/14.3.29
  5. Cartwright-Finch, U. & Lavie, N. (2007). The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition, 102, 321-340. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002.
  6. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  7. Einhäuser, W., Spain, M., & Perona, P. (2008). Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. Journal of Vision, 8(14), 18-18. doi: 10.1167/8.14.18
  8. Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Expertise. Current 0Biology, 24(11), 508-510. doi: 10.1016 /j.cub.2014.04.013
  9. Francuz, P., Zaniewski, I., Augustynowicz, P., Kopiś, N., & Jankowski, T. (2018). Eye movement correlates of expertise in visual arts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 87. doi: 10.3389/ fnhum. 2018.00087
  10. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.) Boston: Pearson.
  11. Gombrich, E. H.. (1992). Art and illusion (11st ed.). New York: Princeton University Press.
  12. Johnson, M. G., Muday, J. A., & Schirillo, J. A. (2010). When viewing variations in paintings by Mondrian, aesthetic preferences correlate with pupil size. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 161-167. doi: 10.1037/a0018155
  13. Kesner, L., Grygarová, D., Fajnerová, I., Lukavský, J., Nekovářová, T., Tintěra, J., ... & Horáček, J. (2018). Perception of direct vs. averted gaze in portrait paintings: An fMRI and eye-tracking study. Brain and Cognition, 125, 88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.004
  14. Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Leder, H. (2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 156-163. doi: 10.1037/a0014464
  15. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (2), 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
  16. Leppert, R. (1996). Art and the committed eye: The cultural functions of imagery. Boulder: Westview/ HarperCollins.
  17. Locher, P. J. (2014). Contemporary experimental aesthetics: Procedures and findings. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Vol. 2, pp. 49-80). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53776-8.00003-9
  18. Locher, P., Gray, S., & Nodine, C. (1996). The structural framework of pictorial balance. Perception, 25(12), 1419-1436. doi: 10.1068/p251419
  19. Locher, P., Krupinski, E., & Schaefer, A. (2015). Art and authenticity: Behavioral and eye-movement analyses. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 356. doi: 10.1037/aca0000026
  20. Locher, P. J., Tinio, P. P. L., & Krupinski, E. A. (2020). The impact of surface cleaning restoration of paintings on observers’ eye fixation patterns and artworks’ pictorial qualities. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(2), 162-171. doi: 10.1037/aca0000264
  21. Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2012). When art moves the eyes: A behavioural and eye-tracking study, PLoS ONE, 7, 5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037285

Cite this publication

APA 7

Cangöz, B., Oktay, B., Rüzgar Kayıran, N., & Emmungil Karamanoğlu, S. (2020). Art Education and Expertise An Eye Tracking Study. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Letters, 38(1), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.780593

BibTeX

@article{cangoz2020art,
  author = {Cang{\"o}z, Banu and Oktay, Bahadir and R{\"u}zgar Kay{\i}ran, Necla and Emmungil Karamano{\u{g}}lu, Serap},
  title = {{Art Education and Expertise An Eye Tracking Study}},
  journal = {Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Letters},
  volume = {38},
  number = {1},
  pages = {259--271},
  publisher = {Hacettepe {\"U}niversitesi},
  year = {2020},
  month = {8},
  issn = {1301-5737},
  doi = {10.32600/huefd.780593},
  url = {https://hacettepe.hbtech.com.tr/en/publication/art-education-and-expertise-an-eye-tracking-study},
  language = {en},
  keywords = {Psychology},
  abstract = {The impact of education and expertise in art on the process of examining a work of art has been studied in the present study via eye tracking method. The main purpose of the study was to compare a group of experts and non-experts in art with regard to eye tracking measurements, artwork analyses and recall performance. In this research, expert and non-expert groups were compared in terms of eye tracking measurements, heat maps, artwork analysis and the recall performances. Heat maps were demonstrated that experts viewed Early Renaissance and Fauvism movements, artworks more while non-experts viewed Fauvist artworks more in comparison with AOIs. However, it was indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the expert and non-expert groups for each artwork about eye metrics and recall performance during art-work analysis. On the other hand, artwork analysis grades of the experts were deter-mined to be higher at a statistically significant level in comparison with the non-experts.},
  affiliation = {HACETTEPE {\"U}N{\.I}VERS{\.I}TES{\.I} and S{\"U}LEYMAN DEM{\.I}REL {\"U}N{\.I}VERS{\.I}TES{\.I} and HACETTEPE {\"U}N{\.I}VERS{\.I}TES{\.I} and HACETTEPE {\"U}N{\.I}VERS{\.I}TES{\.I}}
}
.bib

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cangöz, Banu
AU  - Oktay, Bahadir
AU  - Rüzgar Kayıran, Necla
AU  - Emmungil Karamanoğlu, Serap
TI  - Art Education and Expertise An Eye Tracking Study
T2  - Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Letters
VL  - 38
IS  - 1
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/08/14/
SP  - 259
EP  - 271
PB  - Hacettepe Üniversitesi
SN  - 1301-5737
DO  - 10.32600/huefd.780593
UR  - https://hacettepe.hbtech.com.tr/en/publication/art-education-and-expertise-an-eye-tracking-study
AB  - The impact of education and expertise in art on the process of examining a work of art has been studied in the present study via eye tracking method. The main purpose of the study was to compare a group of experts and non-experts in art with regard to eye tracking measurements, artwork analyses and recall performance. In this research, expert and non-expert groups were compared in terms of eye tracking measurements, heat maps, artwork analysis and the recall performances. Heat maps were demonstrated that experts viewed Early Renaissance and Fauvism movements, artworks more while non-experts viewed Fauvist artworks more in comparison with AOIs. However, it was indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the expert and non-expert groups for each artwork about eye metrics and recall performance during art-work analysis. On the other hand, artwork analysis grades of the experts were deter-mined to be higher at a statistically significant level in comparison with the non-experts.
KW  - Psychology
LA  - en
AD  - HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
AD  - SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
AD  - HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
AD  - HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
ER  - 
.ris